The Rued Morgue has love for
the most famous works of Lewis Carroll, but it wasn’t that love specifically that led to the
desire to check out and review these two recent DVD releases from the BBC.
Unsurprisingly, both programs have Doctor Who connections, and both
I’ve known about for years, but have never seen. Kudos to the BBC folks who dug deep
into the archives and unearthed these rarities for public consumption. A few
years ago I reviewed another BBC TV version of Alice in Wonderland (1966) – a version that was a drastic departure in terms of
presentation from what we’ve come to expect from the classic story. This version? Not so much. Not at all,
really. Indeed, it is extremely faithful to Carroll’s work, and nearly all of
the dialogue (including a number of songs) seems to have been lifted directly
from the original text, and it covers most of the book. Having suffered through
the plastic Tim Burton movie, Carroll scholars will surely find this a worthy
adaptation based on the dialogue alone.
Titled Alice in Wonderland, the episodes are dated 1985, but according to IMDB, it started airing on the BBC the first week of
1986. It was produced by Terrance Dicks and dramatized and directed by Barry
Letts, and like a classic Who serial, is presented over four episodes, each
running nearly 30 minutes. In addition to the behind the scenes contributions
of Messrs. Dicks and Letts, this production features some other noteworthy Who alumni:
Elisabeth Sladen as the Dormouse, her husband Brian Miller (“Snakedance”) as
the Gryphon, Roy Skelton as the Mock Turtle, and Michael “Davros” Wisher as a
pretty sinister Cheshire Cat; all four appear under heavy makeup and are
barely recognizable. However, heavy doesn’t necessarily equate to great, and these
creatures are often not much more convincing than the sort of thing you’d see
at a professional children’s theatre (the production often feels like theatre). Having said that, many of the
anthropomorphized creatures bear striking resemblances to the illustrations drawn
by Sir John Tenniel to accompany Carroll’s original text, so in a sense, the
effects, makeup and costuming strive to be true to the original work as well.
This is a low budget video
affair, produced on more of a shoestring than even Doctor Who (which was on its
infamous mid-80s hiatus at the time this was made). The production is loaded with Letts’
notorious CSO, which, alongside some basic set work, is used to achieve
Wonderland. The BBC version of the technique had been honed considerably by ’86
(versus when Letts when using it on Who during the early ‘70s), so it doesn’t
look bad, per se, but it is a matter of getting used to the surreal-but-often-flat atmosphere. Who’s to say what Alice ’s imagination dreamed up?
What sold me on this Alice was the dawning
realization that Letts and Dicks are seemingly paying homage of sorts to the
1939 film version of The Wizard of Oz. The styles used to achieve the two productions are similar, even though they’re separated by decades and tools.
Today, the painted backgrounds used to frequently bring Oz to life would be
unthinkable, as would these flat CSO backgrounds – but the end results
aren’t terribly different if you analyze them sans prejudice. We
(hopefully) make allowances for Oz when we watch it today because it’s an
understood classic, and forgive that it’s a product of its time, just as this Alice is of its time, and
just as importantly, its place: BBC TV.
Other similarities? The use
of songs, the previously mentioned anthropomorphized creatures (ala the
Cowardly Lion), as well as the casting of an older actress to play the lead role
(Kate Dorning’s Alice
is at least 16 here). They even begin each episode with a prologue set in
reality (Carroll weaves the tales to his niece and her friends) and colored in
sepia tone! Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying or even implying this is anywhere
near the same level of artistry as Oz. It doesn’t have the same energy or
vision. Nobody’s ever going to call it a classic – it’s far too restricted by
its TV origins. But I can picture Terrance Dicks and Barry Letts, when putting
this production together, using Oz as a jumping off point - or for inspiration,
if you like, and at the end of the day being reasonably pleased by the results, given what they had to work with.
The second program is Alice
Through the Looking Glass, which, while indeed based on Carroll’s second Alice book, is not a
sequel to the previous production. Dramatized and directed by James MacTaggart, it was shown on Christmas
Day in 1973 as a single 74 minute show, and stars Sarah Sutton (Nyssa of ‘80s
Doctor Who fame) - who was 11 when it was shot - as the title figure. Having
said all of that, it still makes a fine sequel to the previously discussed production,
as the techniques are similar, right down to the dodgy (but lovable) CSO.
Though I didn’t necessarily get the same kind of Oz vibe from this one, its adherence to both
the text and the illustrations of its source material is clear. It’s also got a
somewhat more high profile cast (in terms of British TV royalty, anyway) with
Brenda Bruce, Judy Parfitt and Geoffrey Bayldon all playing sizable parts.
However the standout performance must surely be that of Freddie Jones (Dune,
The Elephant Man) as Humpty Dumpty, who does amazing things with just his face
and voice. Sutton acquits herself nicely as well, and her Alice has a bit more spunk than Nyssa was
ever allowed to.
Both discs are bares bones
with no extras whatsoever, aside from optional English subtitles. While both
programs present frequently disturbing visions that no doubt haunted the
children of their respective days, it seems unlikely that kids weaned on
the production values and dramatic pacing of today would find much to
appreciate here. No, from today’s vantage point, this is fare for adults who
can appreciate the conditions under which these shows were created, or people
who just want to soak up as many screen versions of Carroll’s literature as
possible. Now, BBC, how about releasing Barry Letts' dramatization of Gulliver in Lilliput from 1982?